Episode 1 : The Silent Exit of Mode 2 Co-Lending (Policy Vs Practice)
- Vivek Krishnan
- Aug 8
- 3 min read
Policy Vs Practice Series
Introduction
When RBI first introduced co-lending, the promise was simple — leverage the NBFC’s reach with the bank’s cost of funds. Two models emerged:
Mode 1: Bank and NBFC co-lend from day one.
Mode 2: NBFC originates, books the loan, then transfers the agreed share to the bank after a short period.
For years, Mode 2 was the operational workhorse — flexible, adaptable, and a perfect fit for products where disbursements happened in stages or where bank readiness lagged behind origination.
On August 6, 2025, a single line in RBI’s revised guidelines changed the game:
“The bank’s share in loans under co-lending must be booked within 15 days of the first disbursement to the borrower.”
Why This Matters
The 15-day cap is not just a compliance checkbox — it’s a structural kill-switch for many Mode 2 use cases.

The Mode 2 Viability Map (Post-Aug 6, 2025)
Product Category | Typical Disbursement Pattern | Transfer to Bank Feasibility (≤15 Days) | Mode 2 Viability | Reason for Impact |
Two-Wheeler Loans | Single-day, low-TAT | ✅ Yes | High | Quick disbursal; easy to meet transfer deadline. |
Used CV Loans | 7–20 days incl. valuation & RTO | ⚠ Partial | Moderate | RTO delays may breach 15-day limit. |
Machinery Finance (MSME) | Stage-wise release | ❌ No | Low | Instalment-linked disbursements exceed 15 days. |
Home Improvement Loans | Staggered based on work completion | ❌ No | Low | Cannot transfer partial disbursements under Mode 2 structure. |
Education Loans (Domestic) | Single release | ✅ Yes | High | Works if release is immediate; not for instalment disbursals. |
Education Loans (Overseas) | Tranches aligned to semesters | ❌ No | Low | Semester gap kills transfer window. |
Agri Equipment Loans | Linked to delivery from dealer | ⚠ Partial | Moderate | Seasonal delivery delays can push beyond limit. |
Project-Linked MSME Term Loans | Milestone-based | ❌ No | Low | Almost all breach 15-day cap. |
Working Capital Term Loans (WCTL) | Single release | ✅ Yes | High | If sanctioned amount is released at once. |
Invoice Discounting | Single-day post acceptance | ✅ Yes | High | Fits perfectly with Mode 2 timelines. |
Sector-Level Impact
Agri Machinery Finance
Before: NBFC could book the loan when farmer placed order, wait for delivery (often weeks later), then transfer share to bank.
Now: Delay in delivery breaches 15-day window → bank participation drops → NBFC funds the entire loan or shifts to Mode 1.
Project-Linked MSME Loans
Before: Funds released in phases after site inspection. Transfer to bank possible after first milestone.
Now: Milestone gap > 15 days kills Mode 2 feasibility → Mode 1 becomes default, even if bank risk appetite is lower in early stages.
Policy vs Practice: The Gap
Policy intent: Faster booking, cleaner risk-sharing, reduced warehousing risk for NBFCs.
Practical outcome: Entire product lines in NBFC portfolios lose Mode 2 viability.
Unintended consequence: Push towards Mode 1 in products where banks historically had low appetite at origination stage.
Where Do We Go From Here?
For NBFCs: Re-engineer disbursement processes to fit the 15-day cap or redesign products for Mode 1.
For Banks: Build faster credit ops for milestone/staggered products or risk losing co-lending share.
For Regulators: Consider sector-specific relaxations where staged disbursements are inherent to the product.
Conclusion
Mode 2 was never just a loophole — it was a bridge between NBFC agility and bank prudence. The August 2025 directive doesn’t just change timelines — it changes the feasibility of co-lending for entire sectors.
If policy and practice don’t converge, we risk losing the very diversity in co-lending products that the framework was meant to foster.












Comments