The Necklace: An Exhaustive Borrower–Banker Classification
- Vivek Krishnan
- 4 days ago
- 6 min read
ORNAMENT Sub Series : Gold Jewellery Business : EPISODE 16
When Meera walked up to the gold-loan counter with her wedding necklace in hand, she wasn’t thinking about LTV or purity. She was thinking: ‘Can I get enough to cover one month’s bills without losing this forever?’ That small internal question — not the gold price — is what this whole episode is about.

How a Banker Sees the Necklace
(Cold, technical, recoverability-driven)

Net gold weight
Purity (22K / 916)
Construction risk
Melt value
LTV eligibility
Implied message
“This is collateral.”
How a Borrower Feels the Necklace
(Warm, emotional, future-oriented)

Wedding memory
Family approval
Fear of loss
Hope of redemption
“Temporary problem”
Implied message
“This is identity.”
The Loan Decision happens on the Left
The emotional burden is carried on the right
Before deciding how much loan to take, you must first understand what kind of necklace you own.
Banks don’t see jewellery the way jewellers or families do.
They see gold recovery risk.
1️⃣ Plain Gold Chains

(Highest Comfort Category)
What it is
Rope chains
Box chains
Curb / anchor chains
Uniform links
No stones, no enamel, no hollowing
Why bankers like it
Pure gold recovery
Easy to melt
Predictable purity
Minimal handling loss
Operational reality
Closest thing to “raw gold” in jewellery form
Likely LTV👉 70% – 75% (Best-in-class)

2️⃣ Solid Gold Necklaces / Harams

(Mango haram, Lakshmi haram, thick temple harams)
What it is
Heavy, gold-dominant construction
Minimal hollow sections
Traditional solid craftsmanship
Why haircut exists
Design premium is ignored
Some melting loss assumed
Conservative weight deduction
Borrower misunderstanding
“This is premium jewellery”
Bank response: “We lend on gold, not artistry.”
Likely LTV👉 65% – 70%
3️⃣ Long Haram / Layered Necklaces

These are:
High gram-weight
Often ceremonial
Worn infrequently
Stored deep in lockers
They appeal to borrowers because:
a single ornament meets a large loan requirement,
fewer items need to be pledged.
Borrower behaviour: Chosen for efficiency, not comfort. High redemption intent, but high renewal risk if stress lingers.
Long Haram
Very high gram-weight in a single ornament
Often layered, sometimes detachable
Gold mass is spread across length, not compact
May include hollow elements for wearability
Other Necklaces (short / solid / ceremonial)
Moderate weight per ornament
More compact gold concentration
Easier to judge solidity
Less structural complexity
Key difference:
A long haram looks heavy because it is long; a solid necklace looks heavy because it is dense.

Behaviour After Pledge (This is where risk appears)
Aspect | Long Haram | Other Necklaces |
Initial redemption intent | Very high | Moderate to high |
Renewal likelihood | High if stress lingers | Lower |
Emotional resistance | Appears late | Appears early |
Exit difficulty | Increases sharply over time | Gradual |
Stress recognition | Delayed | Earlier |
Banker’s View (Silent but decisive)
Long Haram
Weight meets loan need quickly ✔
Fewer items to handle ✔
But:
layered construction
mixed solidity
melting loss assumptions
👉 Results in slightly lower LTV and higher renewal tracking
4️⃣ Temple / Heirloom Necklaces
Often:
Older designs
Inherited
Sentiment-heavy
Family-linked (mother, grandmother)
These necklaces are:
rarely chosen first,
often pledged under compulsion,
and emotionally loaded far beyond their gold value.
Borrower behaviour: Extreme reluctance to lose. Auction is seen as personal failure, not financial outcome.

5. Mangalsutra-Linked Gold Chains

Though technically necklaces, these are:
Symbolic
Identity-linked
Socially sensitive
They are usually:
not pledged unless unavoidable,
or pledged after removing the symbolic elements.
Borrower behaviour: High psychological cost, even if gold weight is modest.
Why This Classification Matters to Borrowers
At the branch counter, all necklaces are:
weighed,
purity-tested,
and valued identically per gram.
But borrowers do not experience them identically.
Each type differs in:
willingness to pledge,
tolerance for renewal,
emotional stress during rollover,
and pain of non-redemption.
When borrowers unknowingly pledge the wrong type of necklace for a given loan need, they don’t feel the impact immediately.
They feel it:
at the first renewal,
at the second extension,
when interest piles up,
or when family resistance appears.
Now that we understand what kinds of necklaces exist, the next questions become inevitable:
Which necklace types are suitable for short-term liquidity?
Which should be reserved only for last-resort borrowing?
Why do some necklace loans renew smoothly while others become emotionally suffocating?
What signals does a borrower send — unknowingly — by choosing one type over another?
That is where behaviour begins.
Behavioural Summary by Necklace Type (Gold Loan Context)
Necklace Type | Typical Borrower Trigger | Borrower Mindset at Pledge | Redemption Intent | Renewal Risk | Banker’s Silent Reading |
Plain Gold Chains | Short-term liquidity need | “This is temporary. I’ll get this back.” | Very high | Low | Early-stage stress, manageable |
Short / Solid Necklaces | Planned expense or mild stress | “This is valuable but replaceable.” | High | Low–moderate | Stable borrower, good exit probability |
Thick / Heavy Chains | Efficiency-driven choice | “One piece should be enough.” | High | Moderate | Value concentration begins |
Long Haram / Layered Necklaces | Large loan requirement | “Better to pledge one big ornament.” | Initially high | High if stress persists | Stress masked by efficiency |
Multiple Necklaces Together | Escalating financial pressure | “Let me solve this fully now.” | Mixed | High | Duration risk emerging |
Temple / Heirloom Necklaces | Compulsion, last options exhausted | “I had no other choice.” | Emotionally desired but delayed | Very high | Structural stress confirmed |
Mangalsutra-Linked Chains | Extreme necessity | “I hope no one notices.” | Extremely high emotionally | Variable | Psychological cost exceeds value |
Loan Requirement vs Jewel Selection Matrix
Loan Amount Required | Gold Value Needed (₹) | Approx. Gold Weight (grams) | Jewellery Type Best Suited | Why This Works Smoothly |
₹50,000 – ₹1,00,000 | ₹75,000 – ₹1,50,000 | 9 – 18 g | Plain gold chain / light necklace | Easy redemption, minimal emotional cost |
₹1,00,000 – ₹2,50,000 | ₹1.5 – ₹3.75 lakh | 18 – 44 g | Solid chain / short necklace / bangles | Common household jewellery, low resistance |
₹2,50,000 – ₹5,00,000 | ₹3.75 – ₹7.5 lakh | 44 – 88 g | Thick chain / solid necklace / limited bangles | Efficient pledge without emotional escalation |
₹5,00,000 – ₹7,50,000 | ₹7.5 – ₹11.25 lakh | 88 – 132 g | Long haram / layered necklace | Single-ornament efficiency; renewal watch needed |
₹7,50,000 – ₹10,00,000 | ₹11.25 – ₹15 lakh | 132 – 176 g | Long haram + chain / heavy necklace | Works, but signals rising financial stress |
₹10,00,000 – ₹15,00,000 | ₹15 – ₹22.5 lakh | 176 – 265 g | Multiple necklaces / bangles set | Family involvement, banker scrutiny increases |
₹15,00,000 – ₹25,00,000 | ₹22.5 – ₹37.5 lakh | 265 – 440 g | Heirloom + ceremonial jewellery | High emotional cost, last-resort zone |
₹25,00,000+ | ₹37.5 lakh+ | 440 g+ | Multiple heirloom pieces | Structural stress, auction sensitivity |
Quick Borrower Thumb Rules
🔹 Under ₹5 lakh
Stick to chains and simple necklaces
Avoid emotionally loaded jewellery
Expect smooth redemption
🔹 ₹5–10 lakh
Long harams become attractive
Watch for renewal dependency
Still manageable with discipline
🔹 Above ₹10 lakh
Jewellery choice signals structural stress
Emotional resistance rises sharply
Banker monitoring increases
Why This Table Matters (Behavioural Insight)
Smaller loans should use replaceable jewellery
Bigger loans force value concentration
Trouble begins when ornament choice jumps faster than loan need
If the loan amount forces you to pledge jewellery you never intended to touch, the loan is already telling you something important.
Summary :
Why the Necklace Matters — and Where the Story Moves Next
Gold may be valued by weight and purity, but necklaces and chains are chosen by intent.
In this episode, we looked at necklaces not as ornaments, but as signals—of urgency, confidence, hesitation, and expectation. We saw how construction determines valuation, how emotion shapes pledging decisions, and how the same piece of gold is experienced very differently by borrowers and bankers.
For borrowers, a necklace is often pledged with the belief that the need is temporary and redemption is certain.For bankers, it is collateral—measured, discounted, and prepared for recovery if required.
The gap between these two views is where renewal risk, emotional stress, and prolonged borrowing quietly emerge.
Understanding necklaces and chains matters because they are usually the first major step into gold lending. They tell us how a borrower enters the loan—and how they believe the story will end.
In the next episode, we move from entry to continuity.
We will examine bangles—the most frequently repeated, partially pledged, and renewed form of gold collateral—and explore how they transform gold loans from one-time solutions into ongoing arrangements.
Because in gold lending, necklaces show intent — bangles reveal duration.












Comments